Jancis Robinson meets Colin GlaetzerJancis Robinson, The UK Financial Times & Jancis Robinsons' websiteJul 2005
A drive round the We leave his winery on the outskirts of Tanunda and pass neat, freshly painted versions of
En route to the venerable vineyards of Ebenezer, one of Barossa’s distinctive terroirs, Glaetzer and his other son Sam who works for Foster’s Barossa Valley wine division, point out the famous Kalimna vineyard, source of some of Penfolds’ most revered raw ingredients. We pass the tiny Ebenezer community hall on a wide dirt track and a little tin-roofed church surrounded by trees – both obviously lovingly maintained.
At one point there are vines on both sides of the road. About the vineyard on the right, its vines weighed down with purple bunches, Glaetzer growls, 'the owners of that one are too keen on water. It’ll get to the point where we stop buying from them.' He approves of the much more sparsely-fruited, gnarled old vines on the left though. 'Some of the grapes from here go to us, some to Penfolds for Grange,' he says with a reference to
'By whom?' I ask, knowing how serious the labour shortage is in rural
level in this vineyard planted early last century. 'Good, small clusters,' he observes approvingly.
'The yield here’ll be about half a tonne per acre. If yields go over two tonnes an acres, you may as well buy your fruit upriver. Anything over two and you’ve lost the plot quality-wise.' South Australia’s most famous wine region is certainly very, very different from the state’s biggest, the heavily-irrigated Riverland, a vast tract of factory-farmed vines that stretches along the banks of the Murray River in Australia’s scorched interior.
I find many Barossa Shirazes unbalanced: picked too late they can be too alcoholic, dry and/or overripe, but the following represent animated rather than dead fruit and manage to combine depth of flavour with energy, interest and refreshment value: Glaetzer, Shiraz 2002
GLAETZER: Impressive and extensive operation in
Glaetzer, Wallace Very sweet and ripe. Well made by a very gentle hand. A very winning initial impression though the wood is a little drying on the finish.
Glaetzer, Bishop Shiraz 2002 From 30- to 40-year-old vines that yield no more than 2 tons/acre, fermented in old American oak hogsheads. Low-key, rather subtle nose and fine tannins. Carries its 14 per cent alcohol well – the wine, or perhaps vintage in this case – seems quite admirably ‘cool’ and well balanced. Glaetzer, Bishop Shiraz 2001 This was one of very, very few instances in which I preferred the 2001 vintage of a South Australian red to the 2002 one (perhaps because some of the fruit that would normally go into the top Glaetzer Shiraz bottling was declassified into the Bishop?). Indeed, this wine seemed almost more developed than the 2002, with more obvious minerality on the nose. Lovely balance – complete. Very soft and round, perhaps not the long-distance runner of the 2002 but a dry, appetising finish and should provide great drinking over the next few years.
Glaetzer, Shiraz 2002 Cool, dense nose with great roundness of texture yet real energy and life. Savoury finish. Bristling with potential. Really animated fruit, much of it from fabulous early 20th century vineyards in Ebenezer, in the northwest of
Glaetzer, Shiraz 2001 A bit more obvious and less subtle than the 2002 with a ripe berry fruit character and a sweet start. Some of the same mineral notes as the 2002 with quite a cool, dry end.
Glaetzer, Savoury, meaty with that minerality again. Lovely balance. Very fine and dense. A really complete, appetising wine, though the acidity is more obvious than on the Bishop bottlings. The 1998 was wonderful – opulent and scented with a good, dry finish. The 1997 also won me over with its muted elegance. The 1996 is now round and gentle but perhaps lacks the punch of its successors at this point in its evolution.
Amon-Ra 2003 This is Ben Glaetzer’s super-modern
|
||
| © Glaetzer Wines | Site Design by JABA |